True Monism vs. X-Dualism

The ultimate simplicity of epistemological unity is the answer to the bottomless and endless proliferation of civilization as utter bullshit.


This blog post is in documentation of The Investigation’s new website, http://truemonism.com/ as it stands at this time. It will change.

Consciousness monism is True Monism, where the word “true” means both pure and coherent or healthy, as opposed to civilization as normalized reality worldwide in every cultural variation without exception as dismal corruption and untruth, pathetic incoherence and pathological delusion of consciousness-existence dualism (X-dualism), where X stands for existence.

Monism means that all conscious reality is one. It is true in the analogy of the varying topography of reality— also known as experience, mind or cognition—as only narrative and not also as existence (X). All consciousness sense data stand in sets of at least three dimensions. Time is the one dimension necessary in the consciousness of movement and change. In such a closed system of three dimensions, time triangulates linear change in relation to two contrasting pairs of dimensions, which therefore stand as variables.

Time also extrapolates as compound change with more than two variables, as illustrated in differential and integral calculus. Compound change narrated as physical force in omission of the infinity of potential dimensions is the entrance for and entrancement of the viral pathology of X-dualism. The idea that the evocation of force and the development of existential agency, moral responsibility and apishly psychotic blame and praise are complete incoherence, reflects understanding that the realization of gravity as force is incoherent. The coherent take on all dynamic experience, like gravity, is that it is the surface manifestation of further (potential) narrative dimensions.

Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.

Nothing coherently whatsoever can be said about existence, beyond “X,” and ignorance of that truth is the final impediment in the famous wittgenstein quote above, wherein ‘one’ is an existential agent force psychotically plugged in as morally responsible or more than narrative.

Share

Objective Monism

Refer the internet book, An Introduction to Awareness, James Corrigan.

Indefinite monism stands as reality incoherently flipped in the statement:

“… what is real is distinguished from that which exists by showing that everything that we are conscious of exists but is not real since it is contingent upon awareness for its existence.”

In sheer contrast, objective monism is coherent in the principle that all objects of awareness are objective and therefore real. This includes both the physical and the supernatural from the most obscure to the most common, even gods, devils and other spirit things. Widespread agreement on the pathetic innate rottenness of such mental objects is that they fall short of ideal reality, in other words that they are subjective—and that humans, pathologically characterized as creating them, must be the actual rot—thereby revealing civilization’s narrative as mired in the chronic reciprocal projection of existence dualism.

The true rot is the epistemic incoherence of the facade and dualism of the contrived (intuitive)* measurement and judgment of mental objects, supposedly against the paradoxical chimera of perfect existential versions of such objects—classically in the heavens, or in some other higher authoritarian symbolism. Of course, humans drawn as meekly subject to the authority of the bullshit narrative stand miraculously protected from such a Mafioso finger of threat. They are the real humans. Such narrative runs untrue like any system about to pathetically collapse. It is the corruption of consciousness. It is reality imploding. Chronically measuring existence or sometimes applying the incoherence of existential attributes to narrative coherence is crap. It is the total dissolution of narrative reality. This is why objective monism as the answer is exclusively epistemic. Ontology is utterly and bottomlessly bullshit.

The question may arise whether it takes “us” back to “Plato’s” The Republic.

Plato and us is bullshit. It is existential dualism, part of the bottomless void of incoherent narrative content. Every single philosophy is cluelessness in the presumption of self-existence and agency as philosopher.

There is a single answer because there is a single mistake. The mistake is dualism. The answer is monism. Measuring incoherence is bullshit because it is a total disease. Acute addiction is simply not in remission by half-measures, and that goes for existence dualism as the most monstrous addiction ever to cripple the narrative.

The matter of existence is moot. Existence is indefinable. Civilization worldwide dismally suffers the pathological incoherence of existence dualism. The debate about the degree of existence of the objects of awareness, and thereby about the so-called subjectivity or ignorance of knowers (subjects) of such objects by the incompleteness of knowledge relative to supposed full existential knowledge is the pathology of existence dualism, or the perceptualization of the supernarrative. The conceptualization of the supernatural as existential Truth roots in it.

* The word intuitive is correct, vs. rational. Rational construct stands only with emotional embodiment. It is only by both emotion and reason painfully simultaneously laid down in the bedrock principle of existence dualism that such incoherent bullshit as God is real, in other words He is real in the pathological delusion that things exist (and that He exists) which is the supernarrative that more than narrative is definable.

Share

Perceptualization

Link to the full context of this blog post: Comments at Conversation One in Quantum Space Theory

“In a quan­tized metric the issue can get a little more complicated.”—Thad Roberts.

A fur­ther caveat applies to quantum gran­u­larity as it applies to all objects. All objects are per­cepts, including con­cepts. All of reality (con­scious­ness) is phe­nom­e­no­log­ical, or nar­ra­tive. The error is not just con­cep­tu­al­iza­tion of the super­nat­ural. It is even more acutely per­cep­tu­al­iza­tion of the supernar­ra­tive. In other words, the evo­ca­tion of mys­tical gods, and the invo­ca­tion of ani­mate per­sons as dis­crete voli­tional objects that exist, stand in mutual construct. As for dif­fer­en­tial cal­culus. It too does not begin to broach the matter of exis­tence. It is but another amusing nar­ra­tive wrinkle.

Perception is the only reality, and it includes the most sophisticated conceptualization. Therefore the word is “perceptualization.”

Share

Difficulty

“System 1 and System 2 are so central to the story I tell in my book that I must make it absolutely clear that they are fictitious characters. Systems 1 and 2 are not systems in the standard sense of entities with interacting aspects or parts. And there is no part of the brain that either of the systems would call home. You may well ask: What is point of introducing fictitious characters with ugly names into a serious book? The answer is that the characters are useful because of some of the quirks of our minds, yours and mine. A sentence is understood more easily if it describes what an agent (System 2) does than if it describes what something is, what properties it has. In other words, “System 2″ is a better subject for a sentence than “mental arithmetic.” The mind—especially System 1—appears to have a special aptitude for the construction and interpretation of stories about active agents, who have personalities, habits and abilities. You quickly formed a bad opinion of the thieving butler, you expect more bad behavior from him, and you will remember it for a while. This is also my hope for the language of systems.”

That is the corruption of systematic narrative also, by personification and anthropomorphism that stands dismally corrupted through thousands of years of organized personal developmental delusion.

It is a very difficult investigation and experiment to grasp only because it literally is the systematic dissolution of the deepest, most sacred delusions of pathological civilized reality: those based on existential and volitional personal identity.

Share

Funky Junkie Engagement

Re. p.48/49 of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniek Kahneman—rationality as a measurement of mental engagement, or profundity instead of mental withdrawal or superficiality. Civilization’s total pathology is blaming persons for the pathology.

All consciousness is sensory imagery. Conceptualization is just another kind of sensory perception. Coherence is not awareness of incompleteness/superficiality, but of incoherence/pathology in terms of the whole narrative, worldwide. Physical existence is the bedrock pathology, a homunculus psychosis of existence dualism, the junkie idiocy that mere consciousness sense data jumps out of the narrative page and engages (as agency). It is the psychotic telling of action—which is only more narrative—as personal responsibility and accountability.

The narrative pathology of conscious reality is consciousness/existence dualism—the attribution of the narrative pathology to individual and group agency supposedly supernarratively embodied and engaged in authorship of narrative.

The problem is not only conceptualization of the supernatural, but also perceptualization of the supernarrative, or the invocation of natural, volitional beings and the evocation of supernatural beings in mutual embodiment of each other.

Share

Healthy Consciousness Deemed Unfit

Character judgment by definition draws ever further away from a simple answer universally understandable as true. Civilization worldwide is a dismally delusional multiple personality society, a kind of collectivized schizophrenia by which the destruction of nature continues to prove to be inevitable.

It is indeed a society of mutual psychological projection (of guilt) pathetically dressed up in farcically contrived empathy, even within persons by way of multiple role playing. So, of course whether disagreement is reasonable criticism of society as mental pathology or desperately painful reaction against it—by instant projection it stands bluntly accused as some variation of individual schizophrenia.

Narrative framed as negotiation between persons pragmatically, implicitly, subjectively and subliminally draws attention to blindly perform in the monkey arena of systematic personal character attribution. The reason for the experiment’s denial to discuss “the issues” is that the framing of personal opinions agreeing to agree and disagree in the establishment of individual personality is the mother of all stupidity. The highest wisdom of such pathological addiction is the most idiotic stupidity.

White-lite enlightenment is no wisdom. It is the peak of delusion.

The problem of overcoming the junkie addiction of philosophical consciousness-existence dualism is the intoxicating ambivalence of the TACIT sublime and the EXPLICIT spectacle in sharp juxtaposition. The tacit holiness of volitional self existence, validated by the presumed volition and existence of God and other spirits, frames highly ritualized junkie delusions of newly explicitly projected character judgment bristling with novel sensations in a hierarchical progression of ever more blindly idiotic fixes in delusion of self-development. Hence, the disintegration of consciousness (noosphere), as reflected in the collapse of nature (biosphere).

Skill is not a quality of your existence or any existence. It is not your skill or the skill of your assumed group. It is an element of the consciousness narrative. You do not exist at all in any normalized meaning of the word existence.

The real danger that may emerge here is to think that personal identity is to not exist. The point is civilization’s whole self-identity orientation is throw-back simian pathology. Healthy consciousness is not about what “we” individually or collectively existentially are, even in the conclusion that it is incoherent to think that we do not exist in the conventional sense. It is about the health or coherence of consciousness narrative.

There is still the problem of healthy consciousness not fitting in a pathological landscape, so for now it is necessary to play the game. How to play the game temporarily as actor and audience of the spectacle of civilization?

See Your Brain at Work: Strategies for Overcoming Distraction, Regaining Focus, and Working Smarter All Day Long — David Rock

This is an outstanding book on how to play the game temporarily as both actor and audience of the pathological spectacle of civilization constructed in the delusional existence dualism of volitional selves. Of course the book is not of the “opinion” that the game is psychotic, which is why its instruction works for now.

This book will be referenced repeatedly as an excellent interim “individual survival tool” to demonstrate that the investigation cannot intend to be in any way subversive and indeed cannot be subversive, since decision making or control is impossible. Also, intention of authoritarianism is impossible.

The investigation reflects critical awareness of exactly the error of the pervasive normalized notion of control central to the bedrock narrative structure of normal civilization worldwide, nearly without exception—or the belief that consciousness represents existence and that volitional individuals and groups exist. The permanent spontaneous discrediting and abandonment of that error will be an improvement of consciousness narrative beyond current imagination.

Share

Science, Humanities and Free Will

Philosophy’s consciousness-existence dualism pathology.

Neuroscience vs. Philosophy—Taking Aim at Free Will

“Philosophers aren’t convinced that brain scans can demolish free will so easily. Some have questioned the neuroscientists’ results and interpretations, arguing that the researchers have not quite grasped the concept that they say they are debunking. Many more don’t engage with scientists at all.”—Kerri Smith

As any good humanity discipline states, it takes good measures of ‘creativity’, ‘imagination’ and ‘empathy’ to understand volitional self-identity. The feeling in the words of such thought, is that scientists are too much of a nerd to grasp it.

Science may generally not be about properly understanding the bullshit psychological-philosophical construct of volitional character, but in precipitously subjecting to its sacred will to action, it is pathetically seduced by it.

The matter of the humanities conveniently rejecting uncomfortable findings of science typically as “those mathematicians” speaks volumes of the disunion of consciousness, namely the logical disintegration of the noosphere and biosphere. Science is drawn up as ignorance of the bullshit psychological-philosophical construct of volitional character, in pathetic prostitution to that construct.

Division of labor with feverish qualification and disqualification of persons by various utility quotients for optimal growth renders all consciousness effectively blind in junkie addiction and is the disintegration of consciousness.

The destruction of species is the collapse of consciousness in psychotic denial of the whole universe as consciousness narrative sense data which does not exist as anything remotely approaching the bullshit homunculus reality currently held sacred.

The answer to coherent knowing and coherent science for the first time in the history of symbolic consciousness is ultimately philosophical. Philosophy needs to WAKE UP to the coherence that self identity is psychotically dualistic invocation of homuncular existence into what is merely consciousness. The dismal fiction of God evokes simply to validate that greater mental pathology.

Philosophy and the rest of the dismal humanities should drag its apish head from the bullshit incoherence of pathetic addiction to self identity and pay attention to the immediate primal symbolic experience of scientific empiricism.

Share

The Question of the Unity Quale

“A concluding chapter explores, in reverse order, the implications of three distinctions drawn in the book: between the experiencing and the remembering selves, between the conception of agents in classical economics and in behavioral economics (which borrows from psychology), and between the automatic System 1 and the effortful System 2.” p.14, Thinking, Fast and Slow—Daniel Kahneman

The investigation’s exploratory thoughts are unintelligible to the normalized instinct that concepts opportunistically signify existence. It defies civilization’s junkie dualism. It escapes the intoxicated kaleiscopic jumble of frames farcically shifting across the dualistic consciousness-existence spectrum. The truth is that the concept “consciousness” cannot refer to existential entity. This means that no part of the universe or the whole universe is consciousness-as-observer. The universe is consciousness as sense data. The notion of explicit qualia is literally nonsense. The question is whether even the notion of a unity quale is coherent.

Qualia differ from person to person which would suggest that consciousness is extrapolated differently to each self. This debunks Chopra’s supernatural claims of one consciousness of which we humans stem.—Naj

Tacit knowledge is to explicit knowledge as potential energy is to energy. Explicit and tacit knowledge realize only in mutual synthesis, where tacit knowledge is by definition implicit or undefined. Similarly, consciousness and potential consciousness realize completely in mutual synthesis, with potential consciousness definable only as unity, or explicity undefined and indefinable.

On this evidence, the thought that existence is indefinable, and that symbolic knowing is incoherent with “existence” taken as the normalized reality—in coherent symbolic knowing, “potential consciousness” replaces “existence” as the normalized reality. Potential consciousness somehow under girds the narrative with no more explicit wisdom or enlightenment than potential energy under girding energy. Only experience-based training mentors tacit knowledge. Potential consciousness is the indefinable unity bedrock of explicit narrative consciousness.

Well rounded feelings, emotions, and sensations are as much sense data as hard percepts and concepts. They do not signify existence or consciousness potential in any way but unity.

Wisdom constructed on material existence or consciousness as existence is bullshit. This stands in the context of the junkie incoherence of presuming to know variation of material existence or consciousness-as-existence, as implied by the previous paragraph. It does not mean that coherent consciousness excludes these potentiality concepts as unity labels. Potentials are indefinable abstracts. Consciousness is simply NOT about how or why patterns form. It is about which patterns are coherent. Presuming to know fundamentals of how and why expert tacit knowledge exists, is incoherent dualism and pathological existential fundamentalism. Instead, the coherent matter of the coherence of patterns is that it cuts across levels of conceptual calculus as movement and change. Coherent consciousness (by definition explicit) does not begin to resolve unity existence or unity potential consciousness, never mind the individual existence of volitional selves or gods.

re. Blog post, Nomenon.

The new word ‘nomenon’ is rejection of the topographical space of ‘noumena’ as the doublespeak by which phony existence invokes. ‘Nomenon’ stands in the place of ‘phenomenon’, contracting reality to consciousness narrative sense data.

Any part of the current incoherent narrative gains sacredly durable existential status as more than consciousness, while it is no such thing. This applies most obviously to the physical but it is also how God and other non-physical abstraction are easily attributed the most sacred existential status in desperately opportunistic validation of the increasingly tenuous existential status of the physical, especially, and most acutely, the existence of volitional personal self-identity.

Note well the idea of existence or potential consciousness as self-labeling. Via the usual delusional homuncular invocation of existence and discreteness miraculously outside, above and beyond consciousness, it seems like valid personification or doing itself, so it must be self-organizing, as if shifting responsibility to some dynamic Invisible Cosmic Directive (Creation or Kharma), often indicative of God and in validation of personal self-identity. The only coherence is that narrative and narrator are invariably the same. There is no agent other than narrative implicit in the very stuff of everything. However the personification is the error. There is by definition no narrator other than literally “the labels” of narrative, and labels are not narrators, but narrative! It is in that unmitigated monistic sense that it is coherent to state that nomena narrate. Invocation of agency and evocation of gods as if somehow standing apart from narrative are the same psychotic dualism.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacit_knowledge#Transmission_Models_for_Tacit_knowledge

A chief practice of technological development is the codification of tacit knowledge into explicit programmed operations so that processes previously requiring skilled employees can be automated for greater efficiency and consistency at lower cost. Such codification involves mechanically replicating the performance of persons who possess relevant tacit knowledge; in doing so, however, the ability of the skilled practitioner to innovate and adapt to unforeseen circumstances based on the tacit “feel” of the situation is often lost. The technical remedy is to attempt to substitute brute-force methods capitalizing on the computing power of a system, such as those that enable a supercomputer programmed to “play” chess against a grandmaster whose tacit knowledge of the game is broad and deep.

The conflicts demonstrated in the previous two paragraphs are reflected in Ikujiro Nonaka’s model of organizational knowledge creation, in which he proposes that tacit knowledge can be converted to explicit knowledge. In that model tacit knowledge is presented variously as uncodifiable (“tacit aspects of knowledge are those that cannot be codified”) and codifiable (“transforming tacit knowledge into explicit knowledge is known as codification”). This ambiguity is common in the knowledge management literature.

Nonaka’s view may be contrasted with Polanyi’s original view of “tacit knowing.” Polanyi believed that while declarative knowledge may be needed for acquiring skills, it is unnecessary for using those skills once the novice becomes an expert. And indeed, it does seem to be the case that, as Polanyi argued, when we acquire a skill we acquire a corresponding understanding that defies articulation.

This is the idiocy of civilization. It is why “a good sense of humor” is so pathetic. It covers up infinite stupidity. It facilitates brute-force gluttonous spectacle in junkie-psychotic shorthand of established narrative. The stone dumb practice of explicit reorganization of subliminal potentials in derivation of ever newer, bigger sensation is the atrocity.

re. above quote, “And indeed, it does seem to be the case that, as Polanyi argued, when we acquire a skill we acquire a corresponding understanding that defies articulation.”

Habitual articulation of skills eventually replacing them, stage after stage of so-called maturity and enlightenment, is the narrative bullshit.

Share

Will to Power to Act

All actions happen in mental agreement with perceived positive outcomes, not outcomes of desire, want or volition. The initiation of actions is spontaneous. It is not “decision-making” or “choice.” Every element of experience at all resolutions, including potentials and realizations of actions and outcomes, is an element of consciousness, not existence. Civilization’s normalized narrative based on the existence of responsible actors as subject to some authority or Creator or as authors of creativity is chronic incoherence and pathological delusion. Psychology and Law based on guilt and retribution of any kind is the atrocity.

The psychosis of existence dualism is the disease of the noosphere in the sense that the destruction of the biosphere does not exist, but is an element of consciousness experience, whether potential or realized. The systematic rendering of environmental destruction as merely potential, including over-emphasis of narrow elements of degradation like global warming, reflects the disintegration of all of consciousness, namely the noosphere.

Share

Nomenon

The new word ‘nomenon’ is rejection of the topographical space of ‘noumena’ as the doublespeak by which phony existence invokes. ‘Nomenon’ stands in the place of ‘phenomenon’, contracting reality to consciousness narrative sense data.

Any part of the current incoherent narrative gains sacredly durable existential status as more than consciousness, while it is no such thing. This applies most obviously to the physical but it is also how God and other non-physical abstraction are easily attributed the most sacred existential status in desperately opportunistic validation of the increasingly tenuous existential status of the physical, especially, and most acutely, the existence of volitional personal self-identity.

re. noumenon at wikipedia

Share

Thinking, Fast and Slow

Thinking, Fast and Slow Daniel Kahneman

“Just as Steve Jobs who was not in the music industry revolutionized it, the non-economists Kahneman and Tversky have revolutionized economic thinking.”—Chuck Chakrapani.

More precisely, psychology has been a significant shift of economic thinking, but there will be catharsis to pale revolution across all dimensional resolutions. The pathological delusional bedrock reality of extensive monkey-shaman bullshit will dissolve as the greatest atrocity in history. The cancerous idea that volitional individual and group agents like Kahneman and Tversky who intentionally decide, act and produce, and all other contents of consciousness EXIST as more than narrative sense data will be abandoned.

Thinking Fast and Slow will be revealed as more fashionable sweet-talking fake-self-deprecating crap strenuously redefining economics as decision making, but this time as REALLY SUBJECTIVE, or as never before existentially subject to “the Man” (whoever He is, He is alpha, He must exist)—in increasingly myopic denial of civilization worldwide as full-blown pathological existence-dualism and delusion.

The idiocy is now so great, it is on the brink of dissolution by the sheer constraint of the alternative, which is the dissolution of all consciousness.

Share

Consciousness Existence Dualism

Civilization’s consciousness as existential volitional self identities and communication between them as persons is “violently” incoherent because existence is in fact indefinable. Self identity is indefinable. To understand primal consciousness as strange emotional phenomena of narrative STRICTLY AS IF they intimately animate is coherent. The agreement that negotiations of intentional actions between individuals represent existence, is dismally incoherent, and the precipitous dissolution of consciousness.

Consciousness is epinomenal* of unity existence, but it is not existence or does not discretely represent or reference existence. I and you do not exist (as persons). Therefore I and you are existence, utterly without means to define how or why that is, or how to existentially differentiate between us. (Existential) self identity is indefinable.

* “Epinomenal” because the concept of multiple “noumena” to which phenomena relate, is literally nonsense. The sensory experience literally does not reflect such things.

Consciousness/existence dualism is the delusional INDIVIDUAL development of incrementally more mature or enlightened denial that the sense data of consciousness is only consciousness sense data. It is the primal-historical co-emotional framework that the PHYSICAL category of experience is existence.

The health of consciousness is simply about degrees of coherence or incoherence. It is sense data. It cannot do anything. Physical bodies do not exert force on each other, because they do not exist. They are sense data.

From The Disease of Force and Existence

“Forces do not exist. Force phenomena only appear mysterious, or require forces to account for them, when those phenomena are explored through a lens of axiomatic tenuity. As Arthur Eddington pointed out, there would be no need to conjure up forces if our expectations sprang from the natural geometry of spacetime. All effects would be internal to the system – natural and expected consequences of how spacetime is structured.” — Thad Roberts

The invocation of existence as significantly described by consciousness is utterly tenuous. The closest existential solution is infinite resolution potential consciousness, not as resolving existence in the least, but merely as unity indicative of it.

Civilization’s pathology is not so-called base human animal nature but a symbolic consciousness massively in denial that it is incompatible with the pervasive perpetuation of early-language shaman animal narrative and human animal narrative drawn as intimately responsible existential action.

Share

2045′s Avatar Post-Humanism

“The common feature of the temporary preference in the addiction range is the full reversal of intentional behavior.” — George Ainslie.

The common feature of the temporary narrative in the addiction range is the full reversal of coherent narrative as noosphere, and it is directly commensurate with the pathological incoherence of the notion that there is discrete or individual existence and purpose.

“Several months ago, DARPA – the Pentagon’s research arm – announced their own plans on creating a militarized avatar project, serving as a soldiers surrogate on the battlefield.”—Dalai Lama Supports 2045’s Avatar Project

That war is unnecessary, pathological, delusional and pathetic will not be clear until consciousness wakes up to the fact that the notion of the existence of volitional selves, and the necessity to dynamically consider others in that capacity, as if reality is more than affect-embodied narrative sense data, is incoherent and devastating bullshit.

The Law as now narrated, as the Alpha Authority’s ultimate Big Stick in a devastating civilization of worldwide suffering systematic psychological projection (psychological abuse) from birth, including projection reciprocate between the many roles constituting one’s so-called own character/personality is as unnecessary, pathological, delusional and pathetic as war, and for the same reasons.

It is based on the incoherent and devastating bullshit notion of the existence of volitional selves, and the necessity to dynamically consider others in that capacity, as if the intricate reality of consciousness is more than affect-embodied narrative sense data, and actually exists.

“My project has very different, humanitarian goals – it involves technologies that could mark a transition for humanity, with endless benefits in the future. But already in the next few years, we will be able to enhance the life of those who are disabled, radically improving their living standards. This is just the beginning. It’s my goal to ensure it is affordable and accessible for all people – not just for the elite and the military,” —Dmitry Itskov

The 2045 initiative is most commendable, but for the critical bedrock fallacy of existence dualism.

Note the elite and the military as the Alpha Authority in the front of the line for everlasting personal life and to ever more remotely and externally wipe out so-called opposition.

Indicative of the utter cultural psychosis of such directives focused in and onto the USA is the current dismal hypocrisy of global-authoritarian circles pushing truly inconceivable weapons technology development (“inconceivable” for complete lack of demonstrable foresight) and gun control at the same time. Such abject delusion cannot survive. The incoherent notions of consciousness-as-existence and the volitional self will be permanently discredited and abandoned which will render war and punishment utterly redundant.

Robotic neo humanity will be more violent than ever before without dissolution of the fallacy that consciousness depicts existence and the fallacy of volitional self agency. Empathy cannot cover up the incoherence of existence dualism.

Share

The Disease of Force and Existence

To illustrate the extent of the current pathological delusion of physical and so-called supernatural consciousness sense data invoked as existence—at the scale of infinity anything finite is infinitesimal, in other words relative to consciousness potential, the actual narrative approaches zero.

Infinite consciousness potential is unity indicative of existence. Actual consciousness narrative does not begin to broach it.

“To be clear, mathematical expressions of forces can enable accurate representations of how systems in the universe evolve, but they cannot give us insight as to why they evolve that way. They do not offer an intuitive source for, or explanation of, those force phenomena. Forces are just magic tricks that distract us from learning Nature’s secrets. With the full causal story the magic would dissolve and forces would disappear.” — Thad Roberts

The problem is that once higher resolution data has been realized and organized, it is just how, and yet higher resolution potential data is why. Coherent consciousness is not concerned about why, how or what. It is concerned about cognitive coherence. Furthermore, space time are but four dimensions of the consciousness narrative. Every conceivable variable is another dimension.

It does not matter how much elements of mental experience stand imbued with and embodied by the incoherent narrative of co-authoring emotion as existence, it remains data.

“Forces do not exist. Force phenomena only appear mysterious, or require forces to account for them, when those phenomena are explored through a lens of axiomatic tenuity. As Arthur Eddington pointed out, there would be no need to conjure up forces if our expectations sprang from the natural geometry of spacetime. All effects would be internal to the system – natural and expected consequences of how spacetime is structured.” — Thad Roberts

The invocation of existence as significantly described by consciousness is utterly tenuous. The closest existential solution is infinite resolution potential consciousness, not as resolving existence in the least, but merely as unity indicative of it.

True bedrock reality is not something like God, with super holy volitional self (in hyper rationalization of the psychosis of volitional self). It is indefinable existence which is the simple fact that existence is indefinable by the definition that consciousness is sense data, and not existence.

Share

Consciousness as Existential Derivative

“The history of human discovery is characterized by the boundless desire to extend the senses beyond our inborn limits. It is through this desire that we open new windows to the universe.” — Neil DeGrasse Tyson

Pathetically and pathologically untrue. It is not the discovery of the universe as existence but its spontaneous emergence as consciousness narrative. It is not a process of desire, volition or action. It is by all coherent evidence the utterly deterministic realization of traces of infinite consciousness potential.

To illustrate the extent of the current pathological delusion of physical and so-called supernatural consciousness sense data invoked as existence—at the scale of infinity anything finite is infinitesimal, in other words relative to consciousness potential, the actual narrative approaches zero.

Infinite consciousness potential is unity indicative of existence. Actual consciousness narrative does not begin to broach it. All of consciousness is derivative (existence:infinite-potential) infinitesimal (infinite-potential:finite-actual) of existence. Nothing further can be said of its relation to existence, therefore actually nothing can be said of it relation to existence.

Share

Individual Survival as Narrative

Coherent consciousness narrative defines individual death as dissipation of some of the deterministic subject matter of the narrative. This does not mean that individual survival is suddenly irrelevant. Quite the opposite. Consciousness sense data for the first time released from the pathological hocus pocus of standing as existence is coherent because it can attend to individual survival without homuncular dualism, ambivalence and paradox.

The notion that thoughts are harmless vs. the real kinetic impact of the physical as so-called action is untrue. It is the delusional error of depicting what happens (“what we do”) as exclusively real, and thoughts (“what we think”) as exclusively virtual. It is the devastating facilitation and normalization of the proliferation of pathologically delusional ideas.

What is true is that all sense data is the same virtual substance, therefore in coherent consciousness the claim that individual existence is virtual does not stand in contrast to the reality of physical existence. Consciousness sense data includes the physical as pure narrative, and not as existence.

The notion of control is incoherent. It is the collapse of consciousness.

Pre-symbolic animal consciousness does not include the concept of existence, so it is not pathology (yet). Pathology is when primal sensation becomes distorted as volitional animation of selves, who are then seduced and tamed (by or as authoritarian “care-giving” narrative FROM BIRTH) to agree at the pain of retribution or maiming to co-author that some of consciousness is intentionally acting individual existence or a matter of individuals empathetically co-regulating the action.

To view pre-symbolic consciousness as animals who punish each other, or even to view it primarily at the level of natural selection, or even as quantum-resolution storm, are all varieties of anthropomorphism and personification framed by the error of agents applying force, or pseudo teleological wave-action.

Pre-symbolic consciousness does not tell the story of personal retribution. That narrative is pure sensation, without reconsideration.

In the conventional incoherent language of discrete agency, watching someone or something else do something is very significantly as if you are doing it yourself, down to muscle fiber stimulation. Even imagining such action, including imagining your own action, has the same dynamics.

Is everything ventriloquised in anthropomorphic form? Is sense data accumulated different from the physical form?

Yes, fiction or imagination differs from so-called physical reality similar to the way ventriloquism differs from speech in that it is simpler, caricature-like and entertaining. Note that mirth and pain are closely related and conflated in the hypothesis that existence and volition are incoherent elements of symbolic narrative .

{Going through the motions in the mind before a difficult physical challenge helps because it readies the whole performance, including the physical body fiber and deeper. Negative thoughts in mental preparation are not good, all the way down.}

Reflective or symbolic consciousness means extensive superimposition of a looser, quicker narrative in tight association with and transformation of primal reality narrative, like the evolution of genetics and organism. Both cut across all levels of infinite resolution potential consciousness.

Share

Consciousness is the Reality

These blog posts naturally seem incoherent. The common delusion that the sense data of consciousness actually stand as the existence and actions of purposeful entities is as deeply impressed as the most addictive meditation. Normalized consciousness is a contorted layering of perverse hallucinations. Spiritually knowing the existence of purposeful gods or cosmic purpose is no validation of such terrible delusion. God and Karma are of exactly the same bedrock bullshit as the existence of purposeful persons, things animated by personification and existential purpose in general.

Civilization spews its bullshit enlightenment and wisdom all over the earth in annihilation of primal consciousness of life.

Civilization WORLDWIDE as a systematic subjective differentiation and integration of the physical-as-existence apart from consciousness, is the psychotic delusion with epidemic effluents of toxic bullshit that is the utter consumption of the noosphere.

The contention here is not at all that you do not exist, but that it is absolutely impossible to know as what and how you exist and that the bullshit now proliferating in the principle of being existence or being your existence is pathologically delusional, including the explanations known as science and religion. It is but further delusional rationalization of the hallucination of the physical-as-existence.

Animals simply do not and cannot contemplate their existence. This includes humans. The consciousness narrative of purposeful existential agency is a psychotic junkie trip known as civilization.

From Non Est Ergo Sum

I do not exist therefore I am.
Je n’existe pas donc je suis.
Non est ergo sum.

The word “est” describes the pathological symbolic construct that the emotionally differentiated space of the physical as dynamic sensation is more than sense data, in other words, that it is existence. Therefore the negative “non est” marks “est” as bullshit.

The self-identity “sum” as abstract element of reality as story, is the antithesis of “est.” It is the only possible true reality. It is true reality only by totally and permanently abandoning the incoherence that physical sensation adds more than just narrative to reality as narrative.

A question asked in response to the quoted post was if I believe that man’s constant actions as ‘persona’ are a thwarted interpretation “psychotic” of ‘anima’.

Affirmative to some of the question and negative to some: both the perception of animation and agency as EXISTENTIAL are incoherent/perverse in self-reflective consciousness (narrative or symbolic sense data). That consciousness is pure narrative precludes the possibility of me or ANYONE actually believing something, in other words the phrase, “do you believe …,” is incoherent because it is existence dualism.

So, that even anima experience is only sense data, and not existence, reflects the only ultimate hypothesis, or the only hypothesis by definition true—existence is indefinable.

Not only is the narrative of human personal individual agents or groups and agencies initiating action psychotic, the narrative that things and dynamics “exist” whatsoever as perceived and conceived, is perverse and therefore psychotic.

Share

Ultimate Transformation of Reality

The transformation of REALITY will be spontaneous, worldwide and at every level at once. This is not for self-help of individual or group. It addresses the pathological noosphere, which includes the collapse of the biosphere as primal physical perception. Narrative that nature exists is pathological. Narrative that it is consciousness narrative is healthy The grave illness of nature is symptomatic of the illness of consciousness as a whole by the presumption that consciousness exists as self-identities with free volition in environments that exist.

This is not how-to think, do and be instruction. It is about all of consciousness-as-narrative at once. It is preparation for total transformation.

Again, this does not mean existence does not exist, but that 1) existence and 2) agency of observation and action are indefinable and 3) whether (1) and (2) are equivalent is indefinable.

Share