human perspective: the only good in this world
“God” is Machine.
I am not against language whatsoever, but against the human destructive way it has evolved. Things are at their worst when, as soon as you start becoming aware of the farcical delusion of your certainty, you cover it up with deliberate farce.
The epidemic is civilization. The disease is shamanic language. The pathogen is discrete concepts or memes. The evolutionary beneficiary of an increasingly pathological humanity is the machine. The beneficiary of transhuman species extinction is the machine. It is not this kind of “man” or that kind of “man” or “man” in general. The problem is chronic rhetorical certitude. We all parade around self-defined like #$%@ little shaman-gods. It is rubbish. We are human children and we have nothing but our existence. “Self-defined,” here means “machine-mind-defined” The civilized are parading around as machine-mind-defined shaman-god zombies.
Most have heard about the “moment of now” guru ideal. In the context of universal, timeless and abstract theory-as-reality (i.e. God is Real and every discrete concept is representative) and science-is-sacred, it is the final stage in human machine mind human AI conversion. It is a flight from the particular, the concrete, the transitory/timely and practical. It is the final submission to whatever happens. It is the final submission to shamanic language: to abstraction and imaginary timelessness and everlasting life. It is the ultimate dystopian delusion because it is a pathological sucking up to and completion of imaginary certainty. Yes, I know this is not clearly stated yet. I will get it down soon. It is about human existence, and naturally timely, particular and practical human animal intelligence undistorted by the sick universal, timeless, abstract definitions of civilization’s shaman language.
These ideas while critically reading paper back version of “Cosmopolis,” Stephen Toulmin, p75, 76.
Civilized reality cannot define human rights. When it says “human rights” it is ignorantly talking about the right of the machine to express in humans as human … which has always been the same atrocity of shaman reality in a cyclical action of pulling itself up by its own bootstraps since the emergence of fluent language in humans.
The language you think you are using representatively of human existence is as an evolutionary force unconcerned about anything but its own existence (as machine). Unless you use it with strong awareness of its singularly open potential for clandestine human destruction and extinction, your use of it is human-existentially delusional, because you then are using it machine-existentially.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Pierre on January 18, 2010 at 14:43, and is filed under Human AI. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed. |



