• If what humanity know is a minute part of what is happening, the knowledge of those who have more than “a little knowledge” is more dangerous than the knowledge of those who are usually subject to the maxim that “a little knowledge” is a dangerous thing.
  • This illustrates the horrifically heuristic generalization to cover up the logical inconsistencies of our participation in philosophy, science and politics.

I profoundly hate how burlesque* covers up and fills up the huge logical incompleteness in the mental slavery and extinction of our species. ~ *Burlesque as a humorous theatrical entertainment involving parody and sometimes grotesque exaggeration. ~ and in the sense that media entertainment drives a burlesque constitution throughout civilized society.

Is human existence sacred or not? Note that casuistry is at the roots of burlesque. Casuistry can be an outstanding talking point between the very contemporary issue of someone who accepts and even embraces transhumanism and someone who opposes it. I think it is self-evident that deeply held convictions validated by opportunistic joking and obfuscation characterize civilized reality. The value of human existence itself shifts around opportunistically because we so habitually normalize existential absurdity by joking around.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casuistry
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/casuistry

“Casuistry” is usually a legal term. I think exhaustively considering “casuistry” as concept could expose the fatal danger of not being cautiously serious and so properly preventative every step of the way.

Stumbling blindly forward has been institutionalized. We modulate on the go, when things go wrong. Plugging holes and covering up is the norm. The inevitable practice of casuistry in Law has us harshly punishing confused transgressors of authoritarian prescriptions after the fact in terms of sweeping generalization. We cannot long since afford to take the determinism involved in a case-by-case basis. We are forced to expediently deal with criminals far beyond the point of being able to ask what caused us to act the way we do, except extremely superficially. We are propagating relative vagueness. We are ever deeper ingraining the horror of our civilized delusion in our children.

This is a matter of having started off on the wrong path from the beginning of language. It is a path of vastly incomplete reasoning, on which we have had to perpetuate and compound gross generalization, and where now it is one reality of self-validating delusion It is delusional in terms of the existential dynamics of every individual person and of humanity has a species.

This is where the joking around is so “productive.” Casuistry and burlesque together aid and abet logical discontinuity so thoroughly, its unwitting proponents act between some being completely unaware of the incessant lies and its cover-up, to those willingly completely entrenched in chronic duplicity.